Thursday, November 18, 2010

Episode 3: Tell It To The Frogs

Before jumping into my review of Tell It To The Frogs, let’s pause for a moment—we’re halfway through The Walking Dead’s first season. AMC has already renewed the show for a second season at 13 episodes. This on top of the news that Disney and Marvel are planning at least three live action television adaptations (including The Hulk). We’re about to see comic books invade TV the way they took over the box office. I hope those shows get the same respect, dignity, and reverence that The Walking Dead received.

Onto the review! Tell It To The Frogs brings the Atlanta-group back to their camp outside the city. As such, the action was scaled back drastically, with only two zombie kills, let alone interactions. I appreciated the chastising of Glenn at the beginning for bringing back the Charger with its alarm still going. That was dumb, dumb, dumb on Glenn's part (especially since last episode the noise was what attracted the geeks). Rick pulled up in the construction truck soon after, and we all knew what was coming: Rick has finally found his family. Breathe easy, zomies (zombies + homies = zomies)! It looks like the zombie apocalypse has reinvigorated Lori's love; she may also be embarrassed and mad at herself and is overcompensating with affection, but we'll find out. At the very least, they had a passionate reunion...in the same tent as their sleeping son. I wonder if she and Shane had done the same, what with her stating, "He won't wake up."

When Lori told Shane to stay away from her and her family, I was shocked. Everything we'd seen to that point showed Shane as a stand-in dad to Carl. Breaking off the affair makes sense, but cutting Shane out completely? Was she that ashamed of herself? She couldn’t be blaming the affair entirely on him, right? Then we got the reveal: Shane told Lori that Rick was dead. Wow. Maybe not the best moment in his life. But let’s think this through: why would he say that? Could be he wanted Lori to himself. Think back to the first episode, when he and Rick are talking about their ladies. Shane’s demeanor is definitely…different when Rick brings up Lori. Or maybe he thought Rick really was a goner. Maybe he knew the only way to get Lori and Carl to safety and leave their over-run town was to lie and tell them Rick was dead. Right now, Shane looks like a giant d-bag but I’ll reserve judgment until we find out why he said it.

The Walking Dead isn’t doing much to dispel any rumors of Georgia being backwater; in Guts we had racist druggie Merle. Now we get sexist wife-beater Ed. We got hints of Ed’s nature while Rick was storytelling at the campfire with some fine acting, but they left it up in the air until the laundry scene. The laundry scene was one of those nice breaks from the intensity of their situation, and reenforced the idea that despite the circumstances, people can still be terrible. The writers succeeded in making Ed infuriating and detestable. When things escalated, Shane came in, freshly infuriated by Lori (and presumably his conscious). The result? Ed will be eating through a straw the remainder of the season. And in the real world, Shane’s entire hand would be shattered. Effective scene from the start of the laundry conversation to the end of Ed’s beating.

The show opened with Merle losing his mind. He might’ve been going through withdrawal, too, which added to his seeming insanity. Zombies were at the chained roof door and Merle was getting desperate. Back at the camp we met his brother, Dylan, who’s as abrasive as big brother. Was anyone else disquieted that Dylan used the same arrows he hunts with to kill zombies? I hope their sanitization is thorough. Anyways, Rick, Dylan, T-Dog, and Glenn head back into Atlanta to rescue Merle, even though the entire camp thought it was a bad idea. I think everyone said something like, “Merle? That piece of trash? Why?” Rick and T-Dog felt responsible for Merle’s death sentence and wanted to make it right. There was also the giant bag of weaponry and ammo Rick dropped in the streets. As the group climbed the stairs and cut the chains, I was worried about the silence coming from the roof. Last time we saw Merle, he was making noise. The silence and reveal were equal parts disturbing. The mindset of a man willing to cut through his wrist has to be questioned. It was an effective hook and immediately had me and my cousin talking.

The preview for Sunday's new episode added kerosine to my curiosity and now I'm counting down the days. Another group of survivor's is in Atlanta, not to mention a zombie attack on the group's camp? Then add in the search for Merle, and it looks like we've got a packed episode coming up.

Final Verdict: 8.536 out of 10 Head Shots. Tell It To The Frogs was a lot slower than Guts, but that is not a bad thing. We got to see how everyone's been living the last few...weeks? Months? Who knows! Key storylines advanced and I'm once again anticipating the next adventure.


P.S.: Sorry this took so long. It's a sucky excuse, but I'm still adjusting to working 40 hours a week. I'll do my best to have my review up by Tuesday from here on. Thanks for reading!

2 comments:

  1. 1. I still want to know what you do, Joe!

    2. "Tell it to The Frogs" has a compelling shape, pushing characters that have just fled a city right back into it (that seemed like the one of the most realistic details of the series so far-- frustrating, dumbly human, redundant from a cinematic point of view. It reminded me of an early scene in the road when the father rifles through the trash of a service station and walks away only to chastise himself for abandoning drops of oil a mile away).

    Gwyneth Horder-Payton made a good decision not to mash the rescue attempt into this episode while turning up the heat on the most interesting aspects of the show with the laundry scene: given the chance, how could society be restructured to avoid or implement all of the mistakes made in the first version? Or, more to the point, why should women do the laundry while the men fail to catch frogs?

    I hope the show takes advantage of an amputated world to dramatize the events of local governance.

    3. Lori's anger towards Shane seems artificial-- and maybe it is, an excuse not to hate herself so much for abandoning her husband-- but why couldn't she have told Rick, "We thought you were dead," because he would answer, "I totally understand what with the new apex predator that violates the laws of God threatening everyone." The only way Shane's culpable is if he let zombies into the hospital or pulled Rick's feeding tube. But if it's Lori being crazy, well, ladies be trippin'.

    3b. If Shane's undoing comes from Lori (she kills him or doesn't shoot a zombie or something) I would really like to listen to his opening monologue complaining about the light switch girl.

    4. The show made it's first big mistake with lush music during the Rick-Lori reunion. It was grafted on from ARMAGEDDON or RETURN OF THE KING. And THE WALKING DEAD continue to pay homage to 28 DAYS LATER by liberally borrowing from that film's soundtrack with the music played at the end of this episode.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. I thought you knew! I work for the Federal Government. Really putting that Creative Writing degree to work.

    2. I totally agree. You wrote what I was thinking and didn't properly put into text: Are the same mistakes destined to be repeated, or do people grow and learn? Given Guts and this episode, it looks like a mix, but leaning more towards the former.

    3. Lori has to realize she can't hide this from Rick. Someone is going to say something, because you can't hide a relationship from that small a group. I think of lot of her anger is shame, but it's an anger I can understand since Shane blatantly lied about her husband's life condition.

    3b. I bet we get a couple of close calls with Shane and Lori tomorrow and the zombie assault on the camp.

    4. Reunions are the easiest ways to manipulate viewers' emotions. That bugs me, as did the music.

    ReplyDelete